RFC 3734: Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Transport Over TCP
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 4934.
Current document in this lineage: RFC 5734 — Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Transport over TCP
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document describes how an Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) session is mapped onto a single Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) connection. This mapping requires use of the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol to protect information exchanged between an EPP client and an EPP server. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC3734
- Published
- March 2004
- Authors
- S. Hollenbeck
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- app
- Pages
- 9
- Also known as
- —
- Obsoleted by:
- RFC 4934
Topics
Standards lineage
This document is one revision in a chain of 3 RFCs, each formally replacing the one before it.
- RFC 3734 (2004)
- RFC 4934 (2007)
- RFC 5734 (2009) ✓
Read the full history of Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Transport over TCP →
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 28775250 Telnet EnhancementsObsoleted
July 2000
- RFC 2696LDAP Control Extension for Simple Paged Results ManipulationCurrent
September 1999
- RFC 2649An LDAP Control and Schema for Holding Operation SignaturesCurrent
August 1999
- RFC 2259Simple Nomenclator Query Protocol (SNQP)Current
January 1998
- RFC 3749Transport Layer Security Protocol Compression MethodsUpdated
May 2004
- RFC 3646DNS Configuration options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)Current
December 2003
- RFC 3894Sieve Extension: Copying Without Side EffectsCurrent
October 2004
- RFC 3546Transport Layer Security (TLS) ExtensionsObsoleted
June 2003
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?