RFC 3733: Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Contact Mapping
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 4933.
Current document in this lineage: RFC 5733 — Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Contact Mapping
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document describes an Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) mapping for the provisioning and management of individual or organizational social information identifiers (known as "contacts") stored in a shared central repository. Specified in Extensible Markup Language (XML), the mapping defines EPP command syntax and semantics as applied to contacts. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC3733
- Published
- March 2004
- Authors
- S. Hollenbeck
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- app
- Pages
- 41
- Also known as
- —
- Obsoleted by:
- RFC 4933
Topics
Standards lineage
This document is one revision in a chain of 3 RFCs, each formally replacing the one before it.
- RFC 3733 (2004)
- RFC 4933 (2007)
- RFC 5733 (2009) ✓
Read the full history of Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Contact Mapping →
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 3732Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Host MappingObsoleted
March 2004
- RFC 3731Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Domain Name MappingObsoleted
March 2004
- RFC 2718Guidelines for new URL SchemesObsoleted
November 1999
- RFC 2717Registration Procedures for URL Scheme NamesObsoleted
November 1999
- RFC 4395Guidelines and Registration Procedures for New URI SchemesObsoleted
February 2006
- RFC 4931Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Domain Name MappingObsoleted
May 2007
- RFC 4932Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Host MappingObsoleted
May 2007
- RFC 3859Common Profile for Presence (CPP)Current
August 2004
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?