RFC 3597: Handling of Unknown DNS Resource Record (RR) Types
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
Extending the Domain Name System (DNS) with new Resource Record (RR) types currently requires changes to name server software. This document specifies the changes necessary to allow future DNS implementations to handle new RR types transparently. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC3597
- Published
- September 2003
- Authors
- A. Gustafsson
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- int
- Pages
- 8
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Referenced by
6 later RFCs formally update or obsolete part of this document.
- RFC 4033DNS Security Introduction and RequirementsUpdated
March 2005
- RFC 4034Resource Records for the DNS Security ExtensionsUpdated
March 2005
- RFC 4035Protocol Modifications for the DNS Security ExtensionsUpdated
March 2005
- RFC 5395Domain Name System (DNS) IANA ConsiderationsObsoleted
November 2008
- RFC 6195Domain Name System (DNS) IANA ConsiderationsObsoleted
March 2011
- RFC 6895Domain Name System (DNS) IANA ConsiderationsCurrent
April 2013
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 3123A DNS RR Type for Lists of Address Prefixes (APL RR)Current
June 2001
- RFC 3404Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Part Four: The Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI)Current
October 2002
- RFC 3403Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Part Three: The Domain Name System (DNS) DatabaseCurrent
October 2002
- RFC 3402Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Part Two: The AlgorithmCurrent
October 2002
- RFC 3755Legacy Resolver Compatibility for Delegation Signer (DS)Obsoleted
May 2004
- RFC 3845DNS Security (DNSSEC) NextSECure (NSEC) RDATA FormatObsoleted
August 2004
- RFC 2930Secret Key Establishment for DNS (TKEY RR)Updated
September 2000
- RFC 2782A DNS RR for specifying the location of services (DNS SRV)Updated
February 2000
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?