RFC 3579: RADIUS (Remote Authentication Dial In User Service) Support For Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP)
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document defines Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) support for the Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP), an authentication framework which supports multiple authentication mechanisms. In the proposed scheme, the Network Access Server (NAS) forwards EAP packets to and from the RADIUS server, encapsulated within EAP-Message attributes. This has the advantage of allowing the NAS to support any EAP authentication method, without the need for method- specific code, which resides on the RADIUS server. While EAP was originally developed for use with PPP, it is now also in use with IEEE 802. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC3579
- Published
- September 2003
- Authors
- B. Aboba; P. Calhoun
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 46
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 2868RADIUS Attributes for Tunnel Protocol SupportUpdated
June 2000
- RFC 2138Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS)Obsoleted
April 1997
- RFC 2058Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS)Obsoleted
January 1997
- RFC 3575IANA Considerations for RADIUS (Remote Authentication Dial In User Service)Updated
July 2003
- RFC 2607Proxy Chaining and Policy Implementation in RoamingCurrent
June 1999
- RFC 2867RADIUS Accounting Modifications for Tunnel Protocol SupportCurrent
June 2000
- RFC 2865Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS)Updated
June 2000
- RFC 3169Criteria for Evaluating Network Access Server ProtocolsCurrent
September 2001
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?