RFC 3548: The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 4648.
Current version: RFC 4648 — The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document describes the commonly used base 64, base 32, and base 16 encoding schemes. It also discusses the use of line-feeds in encoded data, use of padding in encoded data, use of non-alphabet characters in encoded data, and use of different encoding alphabets. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC3548
- Published
- July 2003
- Authors
- S. Josefsson
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- INDEPENDENT
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 13
- Also known as
- —
- Obsoleted by:
- RFC 4648
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 3614A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for the Motion Picture Experts Group (MPEG)Current
September 2003
- RFC 3593Textual Conventions for MIB Modules Using Performance History Based on 15 Minute IntervalsCurrent
September 2003
- RFC 3470Guidelines for the Use of Extensible Markup Language (XML) within IETF ProtocolsUpdated
January 2003
- RFC 3447Public-Key Cryptography Standards (PKCS) #1: RSA Cryptography Specifications Version 2.1Obsoleted
February 2003
- RFC 3423XACCT's Common Reliable Accounting for Network Element (CRANE) Protocol Specification Version 1.0Current
November 2002
- RFC 3695Compact Forward Error Correction (FEC) SchemesObsoleted
February 2004
- RFC 3861Address Resolution for Instant Messaging and PresenceCurrent
August 2004
- RFC 3234Middleboxes: Taxonomy and IssuesCurrent
February 2002
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?