RFC 3519: Mobile IP Traversal of Network Address Translation (NAT) Devices
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
Mobile IP's datagram tunnelling is incompatible with Network Address Translation (NAT). This document presents extensions to the Mobile IP protocol and a tunnelling method which permits mobile nodes using Mobile IP to operate in private address networks which are separated from the public internet by NAT devices. The NAT traversal is based on using the Mobile IP Home Agent UDP port for encapsulated data traffic. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC3519
- Published
- May 2003
- Authors
- H. Levkowetz; S. Vaarala
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- int
- Pages
- 34
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 6773DCCP-UDP: A Datagram Congestion Control Protocol UDP Encapsulation for NAT TraversalCurrent
November 2012
- RFC 3115Mobile IP Vendor/Organization-Specific ExtensionsCurrent
April 2001
- RFC 3024Reverse Tunneling for Mobile IP, revisedCurrent
January 2001
- RFC 2711IPv6 Router Alert OptionUpdated
October 1999
- RFC 2454IP Version 6 Management Information Base for the User Datagram ProtocolObsoleted
December 1998
- RFC 4977Problem Statement: Dual Stack MobilityCurrent
August 2007
- RFC 5030Mobile IPv4 RADIUS RequirementsCurrent
October 2007
- RFC 5265Mobile IPv4 Traversal across IPsec-Based VPN GatewaysCurrent
June 2008
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?