RFC 3511: Benchmarking Methodology for Firewall Performance
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 9411.
Current version: RFC 9411 — Benchmarking Methodology for Network Security Device Performance
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document discusses and defines a number of tests that may be used to describe the performance characteristics of firewalls. In addition to defining the tests, this document also describes specific formats for reporting the results of the tests. This document is a product of the Benchmarking Methodology Working Group (BMWG) of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC3511
- Published
- April 2003
- Authors
- B. Hickman; D. Newman; S. Tadjudin; T. Martin
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- ops
- Pages
- 34
- Also known as
- —
- Obsoleted by:
- RFC 9411
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 3711The Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP)Updated
March 2004
- RFC 3539Authentication, Authorization and Accounting (AAA) Transport ProfileCurrent
June 2003
- RFC 3670Information Model for Describing Network Device QoS Datapath MechanismsCurrent
January 2004
- RFC 3169Criteria for Evaluating Network Access Server ProtocolsCurrent
September 2001
- RFC 2989Criteria for Evaluating AAA Protocols for Network AccessCurrent
November 2000
- RFC 2882Network Access Servers Requirements: Extended RADIUS PracticesCurrent
July 2000
- RFC 2881Network Access Server Requirements Next Generation (NASREQNG) NAS ModelCurrent
July 2000
- RFC 2866RADIUS AccountingUpdated
June 2000
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?