RFC 3479: Fault Tolerance for the Label Distribution Protocol (LDP)
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) systems will be used in core networks where system downtime must be kept to an absolute minimum. Many MPLS Label Switching Routers (LSRs) may, therefore, exploit Fault Tolerant (FT) hardware or software to provide high availability of the core networks. The details of how FT is achieved for the various components of an FT LSR, including Label Distribution Protocol (LDP), the switching hardware and TCP, are implementation specific. This document identifies issues in the LDP specification in RFC 3036, "LDP Specification", that make it difficult to implement an FT LSR using the current LDP protocols, and defines enhancements to the LDP specification to ease such FT LSR implementations. The issues and extensions described here are equally applicable to RFC 3212, "Constraint-Based LSP Setup Using LDP" (CR-LDP). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC3479
- Published
- February 2003
- Authors
- A. Farrel
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rtg
- Pages
- 52
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 3815Definitions of Managed Objects for the Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS), Label Distribution Protocol (LDP)Current
June 2004
- RFC 3478Graceful Restart Mechanism for Label Distribution ProtocolCurrent
February 2003
- RFC 3612Applicability Statement for Restart Mechanisms for the Label Distribution Protocol (LDP)Current
September 2003
- RFC 3035MPLS using LDP and ATM VC SwitchingCurrent
January 2001
- RFC 3480Signalling Unnumbered Links in CR-LDP (Constraint-Routing Label Distribution Protocol)Current
February 2003
- RFC 3212Constraint-Based LSP Setup using LDPUpdated
January 2002
- RFC 3811Definitions of Textual Conventions (TCs) for Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) ManagementUpdated
June 2004
- RFC 3812Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE) Management Information Base (MIB)Current
June 2004
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?