RFC 3427: Change Process for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 5727.
Current version: RFC 5727 — Change Process for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and the Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Area
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This memo documents a process intended to apply architectural discipline to the future development of the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP). There have been concerns with regards to new SIP proposals. Specifically, that the addition of new SIP features can be damaging towards security and/or greatly increase the complexity of the protocol. The Transport Area directors, along with the SIP and Session Initiation Proposal Investigation (SIPPING) working group chairs, have provided suggestions for SIP modifications and extensions. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC3427
- Published
- December 2002
- Authors
- A. Mankin; S. Bradner; R. Mahy; D. Willis; J. Ott; B. Rosen
- Status
- BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
- Stream
- Legacy
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 12
- Also known as
- —
- Obsoleted by:
- RFC 5727
Topics
Referenced by
3 later RFCs formally update or obsolete part of this document.
- RFC 3968The Internet Assigned Number Authority (IANA) Header Field Parameter Registry for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)Current
December 2004
- RFC 3969The Internet Assigned Number Authority (IANA) Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) Parameter Registry for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)Updated
December 2004
- RFC 5727Change Process for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and the Real-time Applications and Infrastructure AreaUpdated
March 2010
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?