RFC 3290: An Informal Management Model for Diffserv Routers
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document proposes an informal management model of Differentiated Services (Diffserv) routers for use in their management and configuration. This model defines functional datapath elements (e.g., classifiers, meters, actions, marking, absolute dropping, counting, multiplexing), algorithmic droppers, queues and schedulers. It describes possible configuration parameters for these elements and how they might be interconnected to realize the range of traffic conditioning and per-hop behavior (PHB) functionalities described in the Diffserv Architecture. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC3290
- Published
- June 2002
- Authors
- Y. Bernet; S. Blake; D. Grossman; A. Smith
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- tsv
- Pages
- 56
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 3247Supplemental Information for the New Definition of the EF PHB (Expedited Forwarding Per-Hop Behavior)Current
March 2002
- RFC 3246An Expedited Forwarding PHB (Per-Hop Behavior)Current
March 2002
- RFC 2598An Expedited Forwarding PHBObsoleted
June 1999
- RFC 2597Assured Forwarding PHB GroupUpdated
June 1999
- RFC 2475An Architecture for Differentiated ServicesUpdated
December 1998
- RFC 5559Pre-Congestion Notification (PCN) ArchitectureCurrent
June 2009
- RFC 5696Baseline Encoding and Transport of Pre-Congestion InformationObsoleted
November 2009
- RFC 6660Encoding Three Pre-Congestion Notification (PCN) States in the IP Header Using a Single Diffserv Codepoint (DSCP)Current
July 2012
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?