RFC 3230: Instance Digests in HTTP
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 9530.
Current version: RFC 9530 — Digest Fields
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
HTTP/1.1 defines a Content-MD5 header that allows a server to include a digest of the response body. However, this is specifically defined to cover the body of the actual message, not the contents of the full file (which might be quite different, if the response is a Content-Range, or uses a delta encoding). Also, the Content-MD5 is limited to one specific digest algorithm; other algorithms, such as SHA-1 (Secure Hash Standard), may be more appropriate in some circumstances. Finally, HTTP/1.1 provides no explicit mechanism by which a client may request a digest. This document proposes HTTP extensions that solve these problems. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC3230
- Published
- January 2002
- Authors
- J. Mogul; A. Van Hoff
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- Legacy
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 13
- Also known as
- —
- Obsoleted by:
- RFC 9530
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 3229Delta encoding in HTTPCurrent
January 2002
- RFC 3023XML Media TypesObsoleted
January 2001
- RFC 2831Using Digest Authentication as a SASL MechanismObsoleted
May 2000
- RFC 2756Hyper Text Caching Protocol (HTCP/0.0)Current
January 2000
- RFC 3253Versioning Extensions to WebDAV (Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning)Current
March 2002
- RFC 2965HTTP State Management MechanismObsoleted
October 2000
- RFC 2817Upgrading to TLS Within HTTP/1.1Updated
May 2000
- RFC 2617HTTP Authentication: Basic and Digest Access AuthenticationObsoleted
June 1999
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?