RFC 3228: IANA Considerations for IPv4 Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP)
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 9778.
Current version: RFC 9778 — IANA Considerations for Internet Group Management Protocols
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This memo requests that the IANA create a registry for fields in the IGMP (Internet Group Management Protocol) protocol header, and provides guidance for the IANA to use in assigning parameters for those fields. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC3228
- Published
- February 2002
- Authors
- B. Fenner
- Status
- BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- int
- Pages
- 4
- Also known as
- —
- Obsoleted by:
- RFC 9778
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 2939Procedures and IANA Guidelines for Definition of New DHCP Options and Message TypesCurrent
September 2000
- RFC 3679Unused Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Option CodesUpdated
January 2004
- RFC 3171IANA Guidelines for IPv4 Multicast Address AssignmentsObsoleted
August 2001
- RFC 2754RPS IANA IssuesObsoleted
January 2000
- RFC 2434Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCsObsoleted
October 1998
- RFC 2036Observations on the use of Components of the Class A Address Space within the InternetCurrent
October 1996
- RFC 1917An Appeal to the Internet Community to Return Unused IP Networks (Prefixes) to the IANACurrent
February 1996
- RFC 1881IPv6 Address Allocation ManagementCurrent
December 1995
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?