RFC 3225: Indicating Resolver Support of DNSSEC
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
In order to deploy DNSSEC (Domain Name System Security Extensions) operationally, DNSSEC aware servers should only perform automatic inclusion of DNSSEC RRs when there is an explicit indication that the resolver can understand those RRs. This document proposes the use of a bit in the EDNS0 header to provide that explicit indication and describes the necessary protocol changes to implement that notification. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC3225
- Published
- December 2001
- Authors
- D. Conrad
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- int
- Pages
- 6
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Referenced by
3 later RFCs formally update or obsolete part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 3226DNSSEC and IPv6 A6 aware server/resolver message size requirementsUpdated
December 2001
- RFC 4310Domain Name System (DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)Obsoleted
December 2005
- RFC 3008Domain Name System Security (DNSSEC) Signing AuthorityObsoleted
November 2000
- RFC 3007Secure Domain Name System (DNS) Dynamic UpdateCurrent
November 2000
- RFC 3755Legacy Resolver Compatibility for Delegation Signer (DS)Obsoleted
May 2004
- RFC 3757Domain Name System KEY (DNSKEY) Resource Record (RR) Secure Entry Point (SEP) FlagObsoleted
May 2004
- RFC 3845DNS Security (DNSSEC) NextSECure (NSEC) RDATA FormatObsoleted
August 2004
- RFC 4471Derivation of DNS Name Predecessor and SuccessorCurrent
September 2006
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?