RFC 3101: The OSPF Not-So-Stubby Area (NSSA) Option
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This memo documents an optional type of Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) area that is somewhat humorously referred to as a "not-so-stubby" area (or NSSA). NSSAs are similar to the existing OSPF stub area configuration option but have the additional capability of importing AS external routes in a limited fashion. The OSPF NSSA Option was originally defined in RFC 1587. The functional differences between this memo and RFC 1587 are explained in Appendix F. All differences, while expanding capability, are backward-compatible in nature. Implementations of this memo and of RFC 1587 will interoperate. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC3101
- Published
- January 2003
- Authors
- P. Murphy
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rtg
- Pages
- 33
- Also known as
- —
- Obsoletes:
- RFC 1587
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 2740OSPF for IPv6Obsoleted
December 1999
- RFC 2676QoS Routing Mechanisms and OSPF ExtensionsCurrent
August 1999
- RFC 3623Graceful OSPF RestartCurrent
November 2003
- RFC 2370The OSPF Opaque LSA OptionObsoleted
July 1998
- RFC 2328OSPF Version 2Updated
April 1998
- RFC 3883Detecting Inactive Neighbors over OSPF Demand Circuits (DC)Current
October 2004
- RFC 4136OSPF Refresh and Flooding Reduction in Stable TopologiesCurrent
July 2005
- RFC 4167Graceful OSPF Restart Implementation ReportCurrent
October 2005
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?