RFC 2997: Specification of the Null Service Type
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
The Null Service allows applications to identify themselves to network Quality of Service (QoS) policy agents, using RSVP signaling. However, it does not require them to specify resource requirements. QoS policy agents in the network respond by applying QoS policies appropriate for the application (as determined by the network administrator). This mode of RSVP usage is particularly applicable to networks that combine differentiated service (diffserv) QoS mechanisms with RSVP signaling. In this environment, QoS policy agents may direct the signaled application's traffic to a particular diffserv class of service. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC2997
- Published
- November 2000
- Authors
- Y. Bernet; A. Smith; B. Davie
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- tsv
- Pages
- 12
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 2996Format of the RSVP DCLASS ObjectCurrent
November 2000
- RFC 4094Analysis of Existing Quality-of-Service Signaling ProtocolsCurrent
May 2005
- RFC 2998A Framework for Integrated Services Operation over Diffserv NetworksCurrent
November 2000
- RFC 2961RSVP Refresh Overhead Reduction ExtensionsUpdated
April 2001
- RFC 3086Definition of Differentiated Services Per Domain Behaviors and Rules for their SpecificationCurrent
April 2001
- RFC 3097RSVP Cryptographic Authentication -- Updated Message Type ValueCurrent
April 2001
- RFC 3175Aggregation of RSVP for IPv4 and IPv6 ReservationsUpdated
September 2001
- RFC 2814SBM (Subnet Bandwidth Manager): A Protocol for RSVP-based Admission Control over IEEE 802-style networksCurrent
May 2000
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?