RFC 264: The Data Transfer Protocol
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 354.
Current document in this lineage: RFC 959 — File Transfer Protocol
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
RFC 264, "The Data Transfer Protocol", was published in January 1972 by A. Bhushan; B. Braden; W. Crowther; E. Harslem; J. Heafner; A. McKenize; B. Sundberg; D. Watson; J. White. This is one of the earlier, shorter RFCs and the RFC Editor index carries no abstract for it — the full text below is the authoritative source.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC264
- Published
- January 1972
- Authors
- A. Bhushan; B. Braden; W. Crowther; E. Harslem; J. Heafner; A. McKenize; B. Sundberg; D. Watson; J. White
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Stream
- Legacy
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 9
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Standards lineage
This document is one revision in a chain of 8 RFCs, each formally replacing the one before it.
Referenced by
2 later RFCs formally update or obsolete part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 309Data and File Transfer Workshop AnnouncementCurrent
March 1972
- RFC 163Data transfer protocolsCurrent
May 1971
- RFC 265The File Transfer ProtocolObsoleted
November 1971
- RFC 281Suggested addition to File Transfer ProtocolCurrent
December 1971
- RFC 238Comments on DTP and FTP proposalsCurrent
September 1971
- RFC 294The Use of "Set Data Type" Transaction in File Transfer ProtocolCurrent
January 1972
- RFC 172The File Transfer ProtocolObsoleted
June 1971
- RFC 385Comments on the File Transfer ProtocolUpdated
August 1972
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?