RFC 2482: Language Tagging in Unicode Plain Text
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 6082.
Current version: RFC 6082 — Deprecating Unicode Language Tag Characters: RFC 2482 is Historic
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document proposed a mechanism for language tagging in plain text. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC2482
- Published
- January 1999
- Authors
- K. Whistler; G. Adams
- Status
- HISTORIC
- Stream
- Legacy
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 14
- Also known as
- —
- Obsoleted by:
- RFC 6082
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 3490Internationalizing Domain Names in Applications (IDNA)Obsoleted
March 2003
- RFC 5890Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA): Definitions and Document FrameworkCurrent
August 2010
- RFC 5891Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA): ProtocolCurrent
August 2010
- RFC 5893Right-to-Left Scripts for Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA)Current
August 2010
- RFC 5894Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA): Background, Explanation, and RationaleCurrent
August 2010
- RFC 2396Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic SyntaxObsoleted
August 1998
- RFC 3467Role of the Domain Name System (DNS)Current
March 2003
- RFC 5137ASCII Escaping of Unicode CharactersCurrent
February 2008
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?