RFC 2314: PKCS #10: Certification Request Syntax Version 1.5
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 2986.
Current version: RFC 2986 — PKCS #10: Certification Request Syntax Specification Version 1.7
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document describes a syntax for certification requests. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC2314
- Published
- March 1998
- Authors
- B. Kaliski
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- Legacy
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 8
- Also known as
- —
- Obsoleted by:
- RFC 2986
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 2313PKCS #1: RSA Encryption Version 1.5Obsoleted
March 1998
- RFC 2437PKCS #1: RSA Cryptography Specifications Version 2.0Obsoleted
October 1998
- RFC 3447Public-Key Cryptography Standards (PKCS) #1: RSA Cryptography Specifications Version 2.1Obsoleted
February 2003
- RFC 2952Telnet Encryption: DES 64 bit Cipher FeedbackCurrent
September 2000
- RFC 2953Telnet Encryption: DES 64 bit Output FeedbackCurrent
September 2000
- RFC 1620Internet Architecture Extensions for Shared MediaCurrent
May 1994
- RFC 2293Representing Tables and Subtrees in the X.500 DirectoryCurrent
March 1998
- RFC 2630Cryptographic Message SyntaxObsoleted
June 1999
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?