RFC 2298: An Extensible Message Format for Message Disposition Notifications
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 3798.
Current document in this lineage: RFC 8098 — Message Disposition Notification
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This memo defines a MIME content-type that may be used by a mail user agent (UA) or electronic mail gateway to report the disposition of a message after it has been sucessfully delivered to a recipient. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC2298
- Published
- March 1998
- Authors
- R. Fajman
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- app
- Pages
- 28
- Also known as
- —
- Obsoleted by:
- RFC 3798
Topics
Standards lineage
This document is one revision in a chain of 3 RFCs, each formally replacing the one before it.
- RFC 2298 (1998)
- RFC 3798 (2004)
- RFC 8098 (2017) ✓
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 2301File Format for Internet FaxObsoleted
March 1998
- RFC 2163Using the Internet DNS to Distribute MIXER Conformant Global Address Mapping (MCGAM)Updated
January 1998
- RFC 2162MaXIM-11 - Mapping between X.400 / Internet mail and Mail-11 mailCurrent
January 1998
- RFC 1867Form-based File Upload in HTMLObsoleted
November 1995
- RFC 2778A Model for Presence and Instant MessagingCurrent
February 2000
- RFC 3250Tag Image File Format Fax eXtended (TIFF-FX) - image/tiff-fx MIME Sub-type RegistrationObsoleted
September 2002
- RFC 3949File Format for Internet FaxCurrent
February 2005
- RFC 3950Tag Image File Format Fax eXtended (TIFF-FX) - image/tiff-fx MIME Sub-type RegistrationCurrent
February 2005
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?