RFC 2121: Issues affecting MARS Cluster Size
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document provides a qualitative look at the issues constraining a MARS Cluster's size, including the impact of VC limits in switches and NICs, geographical distribution of cluster members, and the use of VC Mesh or MCS modes to support multicast groups. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC2121
- Published
- March 1997
- Authors
- G. Armitage
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- int
- Pages
- 12
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 2269Using the MARS Model in non-ATM NBMA NetworksCurrent
January 1998
- RFC 2225Classical IP and ARP over ATMUpdated
April 1998
- RFC 2226IP Broadcast over ATM NetworksCurrent
October 1997
- RFC 2098Toshiba's Router Architecture Extensions for ATM : OverviewCurrent
February 1997
- RFC 1755ATM Signaling Support for IP over ATMCurrent
February 1995
- RFC 1577Classical IP and ARP over ATMObsoleted
January 1994
- RFC 2236Internet Group Management Protocol, Version 2Updated
November 1997
- RFC 2379RSVP over ATM Implementation GuidelinesCurrent
August 1998
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?