RFC 2112: The MIME Multipart/Related Content-type
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 2387.
Current document in this lineage: RFC 2387 — The MIME Multipart/Related Content-type
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
The Multipart/Related content-type provides a common mechanism for representing objects that are aggregates of related MIME body parts. This document defines the Multipart/Related content-type and provides examples of its use. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC2112
- Published
- March 1997
- Authors
- E. Levinson
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- app
- Pages
- 9
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Standards lineage
This document is one revision in a chain of 3 RFCs, each formally replacing the one before it.
- RFC 1872 (1995)
- RFC 2112 (1997)
- RFC 2387 (1998) ✓
Read the full history of The MIME Multipart/Related Content-type →
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 2110MIME E-mail Encapsulation of Aggregate Documents, such as HTML (MHTML)Obsoleted
March 1997
- RFC 1867Form-based File Upload in HTMLObsoleted
November 1995
- RFC 2111Content-ID and Message-ID Uniform Resource LocatorsObsoleted
March 1997
- RFC 2156MIXER (Mime Internet X.400 Enhanced Relay): Mapping between X.400 and RFC 822/MIMECurrent
January 1998
- RFC 2157Mapping between X.400 and RFC-822/MIME Message BodiesCurrent
January 1998
- RFC 2158X.400 Image Body PartsCurrent
January 1998
- RFC 2159A MIME Body Part for FAXCurrent
January 1998
- RFC 2160Carrying PostScript in X.400 and MIMECurrent
January 1998
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?