RFC 2052: A DNS RR for specifying the location of services (DNS SRV)
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 2782.
Current version: RFC 2782 — A DNS RR for specifying the location of services (DNS SRV)
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document describes a DNS RR which specifies the location of the server(s) for a specific protocol and domain (like a more general form of MX). This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC2052
- Published
- October 1996
- Authors
- A. Gulbrandsen; P. Vixie
- Status
- EXPERIMENTAL
- Stream
- Legacy
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 10
- Also known as
- —
- Obsoleted by:
- RFC 2782
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 1912Common DNS Operational and Configuration ErrorsCurrent
February 1996
- RFC 2230Key Exchange Delegation Record for the DNSCurrent
November 1997
- RFC 1706DNS NSAP Resource RecordsUpdated
October 1994
- RFC 1637DNS NSAP Resource RecordsObsoleted
June 1994
- RFC 2517Building Directories from DNS: Experiences from WWWSeekerCurrent
February 1999
- RFC 1538Advanced SNA/IP : A Simple SNA Transport ProtocolCurrent
October 1993
- RFC 1535A Security Problem and Proposed Correction With Widely Deployed DNS SoftwareCurrent
October 1993
- RFC 3130Notes from the State-Of-The-Technology: DNSSECCurrent
June 2001
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?