RFC 1969: The PPP DES Encryption Protocol (DESE)
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 2419.
Current version: RFC 2419 — The PPP DES Encryption Protocol, Version 2 (DESE-bis)
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document provides specific details for the use of the DES standard [5, 6] for encrypting PPP encapsulated packets. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC1969
- Published
- June 1996
- Authors
- K. Sklower; G. Meyer
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- int
- Pages
- 10
- Also known as
- —
- Obsoleted by:
- RFC 2419
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 1973PPP in Frame RelayCurrent
June 1996
- RFC 2661Layer Two Tunneling Protocol "L2TP"Updated
August 1999
- RFC 3336PPP Over Asynchronous Transfer Mode Adaptation Layer 2 (AAL2)Current
December 2002
- RFC 3438Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Considerations UpdateCurrent
December 2002
- RFC 3931Layer Two Tunneling Protocol - Version 3 (L2TPv3)Updated
March 2005
- RFC 1968The PPP Encryption Control Protocol (ECP)Current
June 1996
- RFC 1967PPP LZS-DCP Compression Protocol (LZS-DCP)Current
August 1996
- RFC 1974PPP Stac LZS Compression ProtocolCurrent
August 1996
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?