RFC 1910: User-based Security Model for SNMPv2
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
In this administrative framework, a security model defines the mechanisms used to achieve an administratively-defined level of security for protocol interactions. Although many such security models might be defined, it is the purpose of this document, User-based Security Model for SNMPv2, to define the first, and, as of this writing, only, security model for this administrative framework. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC1910
- Published
- February 1996
- Authors
- G. Waters
- Status
- HISTORIC
- Stream
- Legacy
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 44
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 1909An Administrative Infrastructure for SNMPv2Current
February 1996
- RFC 1908Coexistence between Version 1 and Version 2 of the Internet-standard Network Management FrameworkObsoleted
January 1996
- RFC 1907Management Information Base for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)Obsoleted
January 1996
- RFC 1906Transport Mappings for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)Obsoleted
January 1996
- RFC 1905Protocol Operations for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)Obsoleted
January 1996
- RFC 1904Conformance Statements for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)Obsoleted
January 1996
- RFC 1903Textual Conventions for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)Obsoleted
January 1996
- RFC 1902Structure of Management Information for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)Obsoleted
January 1996
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?