RFC 1863: A BGP/IDRP Route Server alternative to a full mesh routing
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 4223.
Current version: RFC 4223 — Reclassification of RFC 1863 to Historic
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document describes the use and detailed design of Route Servers for dissemination of routing information among BGP/IDRP speaking routers. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC1863
- Published
- October 1995
- Authors
- D. Haskin
- Status
- HISTORIC
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rtg
- Pages
- 16
- Also known as
- —
- Obsoleted by:
- RFC 4223
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 1930Guidelines for creation, selection, and registration of an Autonomous System (AS)Updated
March 1996
- RFC 1745BGP4/IDRP for IP---OSPF InteractionCurrent
December 1994
- RFC 1773Experience with the BGP-4 protocolCurrent
March 1995
- RFC 1656BGP-4 Protocol Document Roadmap and Implementation ExperienceObsoleted
July 1994
- RFC 3167Request to Move RFC 1745 to Historic StatusCurrent
August 2001
- RFC 1774BGP-4 Protocol AnalysisCurrent
March 1995
- RFC 1965Autonomous System Confederations for BGPObsoleted
June 1996
- RFC 1966BGP Route Reflection An alternative to full mesh IBGPObsoleted
June 1996
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?