CurrentINFORMATIONALLegacy stream
RFC 1796: Not All RFCs are Standards
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document discusses the relationship of the Request for Comments (RFCs) notes to Internet Standards. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC1796
- Published
- April 1995
- Authors
- C. Huitema; J. Postel; S. Crocker
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- Legacy
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 4
- Also known as
- —
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?