RFC 1785: TFTP Option Negotiation Analysis
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document was written to allay concerns that the presence of options in a TFTP Request packet might cause pathological behavior on servers which do not support TFTP option negotiation. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC1785
- Published
- March 1995
- Authors
- G. Malkin; A. Harkin
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- app
- Pages
- 2
- Also known as
- —
- Updates:
- RFC 1350
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 1784TFTP Timeout Interval and Transfer Size OptionsObsoleted
March 1995
- RFC 1783TFTP Blocksize OptionObsoleted
March 1995
- RFC 1782TFTP Option ExtensionObsoleted
March 1995
- RFC 2090TFTP Multicast OptionCurrent
February 1997
- RFC 2577FTP Security ConsiderationsCurrent
May 1999
- RFC 1635How to Use Anonymous FTPCurrent
May 1994
- RFC 2415Simulation Studies of Increased Initial TCP Window SizeCurrent
September 1998
- RFC 1830SMTP Service Extensions for Transmission of Large and Binary MIME MessagesObsoleted
August 1995
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?