RFC 1775: To Be "On" the Internet
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
The Internet permits different levels of access for consumers and providers of service. The nature of those differences is quite important in the capabilities They afford. Hence, it is appropriate to provide terminology that distinguishes among the range, so that the Internet community can gain some clarity when distinguishing whether a user (or an organization) is "on" the Internet. This document suggests four terms, for distinguishing the major classes of access. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC1775
- Published
- March 1995
- Authors
- D. Crocker
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- Legacy
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 4
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 2180IMAP4 Multi-Accessed Mailbox PracticeCurrent
July 1997
- RFC 2696LDAP Control Extension for Simple Paged Results ManipulationCurrent
September 1999
- RFC 4416Goals for Internet Messaging to Support Diverse Service EnvironmentsCurrent
February 2006
- RFC 1823The LDAP Application Program InterfaceCurrent
August 1995
- RFC 1957Some Observations on Implementations of the Post Office Protocol (POP3)Current
June 1996
- RFC 2060Internet Message Access Protocol - Version 4rev1Obsoleted
December 1996
- RFC 2061IMAP4 Compatibility with IMAP2bisCurrent
December 1996
- RFC 2086IMAP4 ACL extensionObsoleted
January 1997
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?