RFC 1714: Referral Whois Protocol (RWhois)
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 2167.
Current version: RFC 2167 — Referral Whois (RWhois) Protocol V1.5
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This memo describes version 1.0 of the client/server interaction of RWhois. RWhois provides a distributed system for the display of hierarchical information. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC1714
- Published
- November 1994
- Authors
- S. Williamson; M. Kosters
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- Legacy
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 46
- Also known as
- —
- Obsoleted by:
- RFC 2167
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 1632A Revised Catalog of Available X.500 ImplementationsObsoleted
May 1994
- RFC 1803Recommendations for an X.500 Production Directory ServiceCurrent
June 1995
- RFC 1943Building an X.500 Directory Service in the USCurrent
May 1996
- RFC 2377Naming Plan for Internet Directory-Enabled ApplicationsUpdated
September 1998
- RFC 1715The H Ratio for Address Assignment EfficiencyUpdated
November 1994
- RFC 1719A Direction for IPngCurrent
December 1994
- RFC 1707CATNIP: Common Architecture for the InternetCurrent
October 1994
- RFC 1726Technical Criteria for Choosing IP The Next Generation (IPng)Current
December 1994
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?