RFC 1548: The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP)
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 1661.
Current document in this lineage: RFC 1332 — The PPP Internet Protocol Control Protocol (IPCP); RFC 1661 — The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP)
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document defines the PPP organization and methodology, and the PPP encapsulation, together with an extensible option negotiation mechanism which is able to negotiate a rich assortment of configuration parameters and provides additional management functions. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC1548
- Published
- December 1993
- Authors
- W. Simpson
- Status
- DRAFT STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- int
- Pages
- 53
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Standards lineage
This document is one revision in a chain of 7 RFCs, each formally replacing the one before it.
- RFC 1134 (1989)
- RFC 1171 (1990)
- RFC 1172 (1990)
- RFC 1331 (1992)
- RFC 1332 (1992)
- RFC 1548 (1993)
- RFC 1661 (1994) ✓
Read the full history of The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) →
Referenced by
2 later RFCs formally update or obsolete part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 1547Requirements for an Internet Standard Point-to-Point ProtocolCurrent
December 1993
- RFC 1549PPP in HDLC FramingObsoleted
December 1993
- RFC 1552The PPP Internetworking Packet Exchange Control Protocol (IPXCP)Current
December 1993
- RFC 1662PPP in HDLC-like FramingCurrent
July 1994
- RFC 1334PPP Authentication ProtocolsObsoleted
October 1992
- RFC 2364PPP Over AAL5Current
July 1998
- RFC 2529Transmission of IPv6 over IPv4 Domains without Explicit TunnelsCurrent
March 1999
- RFC 2675IPv6 JumbogramsCurrent
August 1999
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?