RFC 1495: Mapping between X.400 and RFC-822 Message Bodies
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 2156.
Current document in this lineage: RFC 2156 — MIXER (Mime Internet X.400 Enhanced Relay): Mapping between X.400 and RFC 822/MIME
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
Since the introduction of X.400(84), there has been work ongoing for defining mappings between MHS and RFC-822. The most recent work in this area is RFC-1327 [3], which focuses primarily on translation of envelope and headers. This document is complimentary to RFC-1327 as it focuses on translation of the message body. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC1495
- Published
- August 1993
- Authors
- H. Alvestrand; S. Kille; R. Miles; M. Rose; S. Thompson
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- app
- Pages
- 11
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Standards lineage
This document is one revision in a chain of 7 RFCs, each formally replacing the one before it.
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 1494Equivalences between 1988 X.400 and RFC-822 Message BodiesCurrent
August 1993
- RFC 1496Rules for downgrading messages from X.400/88 to X.400/84 when MIME content-types are present in the messagesCurrent
August 1993
- RFC 1502X.400 Use of Extended Character SetsCurrent
August 1993
- RFC 1523The text/enriched MIME Content-typeObsoleted
September 1993
- RFC 1428Transition of Internet Mail from Just-Send-8 to 8bit-SMTP/MIMECurrent
February 1993
- RFC 1427SMTP Service Extension for Message Size DeclarationObsoleted
February 1993
- RFC 1426SMTP Service Extension for 8bit-MIMEtransportObsoleted
February 1993
- RFC 1425SMTP Service ExtensionsObsoleted
February 1993
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?