RFC 1405: Mapping between X.400(1984/1988) and Mail-11 (DECnet mail)
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 2162.
Current version: RFC 2162 — MaXIM-11 - Mapping between X.400 / Internet mail and Mail-11 mail
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document describes a set of mappings which will enable inter working between systems operating the CCITT X.400 ( 1984 / 1988 ) Recommendations on Message Handling Systems, and systems running the Mail-11 (also known as DECnet mail) protocol. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC1405
- Published
- January 1993
- Authors
- C. Allocchio
- Status
- EXPERIMENTAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- app
- Pages
- 19
- Also known as
- —
- Obsoleted by:
- RFC 2162
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 5617DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Author Domain Signing Practices (ADSP)Updated
August 2009
- RFC 1342Representation of Non-ASCII Text in Internet Message HeadersObsoleted
June 1992
- RFC 1341MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions): Mechanisms for Specifying and Describing the Format of Internet Message BodiesObsoleted
June 1992
- RFC 1506A Tutorial on Gatewaying between X.400 and Internet MailCurrent
August 1993
- RFC 1521MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) Part One: Mechanisms for Specifying and Describing the Format of Internet Message BodiesObsoleted
September 1993
- RFC 1522MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) Part Two: Message Header Extensions for Non-ASCII TextObsoleted
September 1993
- RFC 1523The text/enriched MIME Content-typeObsoleted
September 1993
- RFC 1544The Content-MD5 Header FieldObsoleted
November 1993
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?